ArticleToxics2026
Occurrence, Source Inference, and Risk Assessment of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Effluents, River Water and Groundwater from the Lijiang River Basin, a Typical Karst Region.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research on the river-groundwater cross-contamination of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in karst regions is limited. We therefore investigated the PFAS occurrence, spatial distribution, sources and ecological risks in the Lijiang River basin, a typical karst area. PFAS concentrations were relatively low (0.08-74.0 ng/L, mean 4.13 ng/L). PFBA, PFHxA, PFNA and 6:2 FTS were widely detected. Short-chain PFAS concentrations (0.08-74.0, mean 4.75 ng/L) were higher than long-chain ones (0.02-3.31, mean 0.72 ng/L). Unusually, groundwater PFAS concentrations (0.08-74.0, mean 7.97 ng/L) exceeded those in rivers (0.08-11.7, mean 2.31 ng/L). Positive matrix factorization (PMF) combined with spatial distribution identified five main sources: sewage treatment plants (24.0%), gas station leaks/wastewater discharges (21.3%), untreated domestic sewage (18.1%), small-scale industrial wastewater (16.7%), and agricultural/aquaculture wastewater (20.2%). The ecological risk assessment showed that, except for PFUnDA posing a low risk to algae, the other PFASs presented no significant risk to algae, daphnia or fish. The human health risk assessment indicated minimal direct health risks. Our findings indicate that some PFASs in groundwater and river water may share common sources, highlighting the complex PFAS migration between rivers and groundwater in karst regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.