ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Mapping Scientific Landscapes and Therapeutic Innovations of Targeted Protein Degradation: A Scientometric Review.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Targeted Protein Degradation (TPD) has emerged as a transformative paradigm in drug discovery, offering a robust strategy to address "undruggable" targets. This study presents the first 25-year longitudinal scientometric analysis (2001-2025) of the TPD field, integrating data from 2750 publications across the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and PubMed to map the global research landscape and therapeutic innovations. The results indicate that TPD research entered an explosive growth phase post-2016. China leads in publication volume (1247 papers), while the USA maintains dominance in citation impact (H-index = 80) and foundational leadership. The Chinese Academy of Sciences and Harvard University were identified as core institutions, with Craig M. Crews confirmed as a pivotal scholar. Thematic analysis reveals a systematic evolution from foundational ubiquitin-proteasome mechanisms to the clinical translation of advanced modalities, including Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs), molecular glues, and non-ubiquitin-dependent platforms like LYTACs and AUTACs. Clinical viability is evidenced by the FDA approval of the agent ARV-471 for oncology. Despite this progress, critical challenges remain regarding E3 ligase expansion, molecular design optimization, and off-target toxicity. This review provides a data-driven roadmap for future TPD development, bridging the gap between academic output and real-world translational science to guide researchers, clinicians, and industry partners in navigating this dynamic therapeutic frontier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.