ArticlePharmaceutics2026
Pharmacogenomics of Rivaroxaban: Association of
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo evaluate associations between polymorphisms in
methodsA nested case-control study, divided into two substudies (bleeding and thromboembolic events), was conducted within a prospective cohort of 385 adults receiving rivaroxaban at University Hospital Centre Zagreb (September 2021-September 2024). Bleeding events were classified per ISTH criteria, and genotyping was performed using TaqMan real-time PCR. Cases and controls were balanced using entropy balancing, and associations were estimated with Bayesian logistic regression under a skeptical prior N(0, 0.355); LASSO regression was used to identify clinical and genetic predictors of outcomes.
resultsIn total, 71 patients (18.4%) experienced bleeding events, most frequently gastrointestinal (47.9%), while 314 patients served as controls. No pharmacogenomic variant showed a clear association with bleeding risk (raw and balanced odds ratios 0.80-1.35; 95% credible intervals crossing 1.0). LASSO regression identified age (OR 2.00 per decade), gastrointestinal comorbidity (OR 8.77), and eGFR as the dominant predictors of bleeding. Twenty-one patients experienced occlusive events (15 venous, 6 arterial); however, the low event count precluded meaningful pharmacogenomic analysis.
conclusionsIndividual pharmacogenomic variants in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.