ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Xenon Encapsulation in Liposomes, Nanobubbles, and Microbubbles: Delivery Strategies, Preclinical Evidence, and Translational Barriers.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Xenon is an active noble gas with anesthetic, neuroprotective and organ-protective properties, but its therapeutic application remains limited by high cost, the need for specialized delivery systems, and the inefficiency of conventional inhalation administration. In this context, Xenon encapsulation into lipid-based nanocarriers, including liposomes and microbubbles, has emerged as a promising strategy to improve targeted delivery, reduce overall Xenon consumption, and enable stimulus-responsive release. This review summarizes current approaches to Xenon loading into liposomes and microbubbles, with emphasis on formulation principles, physicochemical characteristics, stability, acoustic behavior, and ultrasound-triggered release. We further analyze available evidence from preclinical animal models, particularly ischemic stroke, traumatic brain injury, and subarachnoid hemorrhage, where Xenon-loaded carriers have demonstrated the potential to reduce tissue injury and improve functional outcomes. Particular attention is given to the comparative advantages and limitations of liposomal and microbubble-based platforms, including the loading efficiency, circulation behavior, and translational feasibility. Overall, Xenon encapsulation technologies represent a promising direction for the development of localized and potentially more economical Xenon-based therapy. However, further standardization of carrier characterization, dosing strategies, and preclinical protocols is required before these systems can be reliably advanced toward clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.