ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Advances in Dendrimer-Based Anti-Infective Systems: In Vivo Insights and Perspectives.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rise of antimicrobial resistance and the persistence of difficult-to-treat infections have stimulated interest in new strategies to overcome these problems. Among these strategies, dendrimers, which are highly branched monodisperse macromolecules, have emerged as innovative antimicrobial and anti-infective platforms. Dendrimers can act as intrinsic antimicrobial agents through multivalent interactions or membrane disruption or serve as nanocarriers for antibiotics, antiviral agents, antibiofilm compounds, gas-releasing active molecules, or photosensitizers. This review analyzes dendrimer-based anti-infective systems for which in vivo or clinical evaluation has been reported. The literature covers diverse platforms, including PAMAM, poly(L-lysine), peptide, carbosilane, phosphorhydrazone, polyglycerol, polyester, and other dendritic architectures. The available evidence includes infected animal models, pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies, local tolerance studies, and clinical trials. PAMAM systems are the most extensively explored preclinically, whereas poly(L-lysine) dendrimer astodrimer/SPL7013 remains the most clinically advanced example. Overall, dendrimers provide a chemically tunable and biologically versatile approach to anti-infective research, but the current evidence remains heterogeneous. Direct comparison across studies is limited by differences in dendrimer scaffold, generation, surface chemistry, formulation, pathogen, infection model, administration route, dosing regimen, and biological endpoint. Future development will require better-defined in vivo models, more systematic safety and biodistribution studies, clearer structure-activity relationships, and stronger links between in vitro activity and clinically relevant efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.