Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42514926›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2026

Breaking the Silent Barrier: Engineering Antibodies for Brain-Targeted Rabies Immunotherapy.

Chen Sun, Liang Xiao, Xiao Guo, Wenxin Wang, Kaihong Zhang, Lei Wang, Zhiqiang Lin, Zhaohui Tang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chen SunDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Wuhan 430023, China.
Liang XiaoDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Wuhan 430023, China.
Xiao GuoDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Wuhan 430023, China.
Wenxin WangDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Wuhan 430023, China.
Kaihong ZhangDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Wuhan 430023, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Wuhan 430023, China.
Zhiqiang LinDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical Care, Tongji Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Zhaohui TangDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical Care, Tongji Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.

Funding

China University Industry-University-Research Innovation Fund 2024hr019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies remains one of the clearest therapeutic paradoxes in infectious diseases: it is largely preventable before neuroinvasion, yet once clinical symptoms appear, mortality approaches 100%. This sharp transition reflects more than delayed diagnosis alone. Wild-type rabies virus reaches and spreads within the central nervous system under conditions of relative immune silence, while the blood-brain barrier (BBB) severely restricts the entry of circulating immune effectors, including virus-neutralizing antibodies. As a result, conventional immunotherapy, although highly effective in post-exposure prophylaxis, performs poorly after symptom onset because it no longer reaches the relevant compartment. This review examines whether engineered antibodies can overcome that limitation and provide a realistic path toward brain-targeted rabies immunotherapy. We first outline why symptomatic rabies remains refractory to standard immune intervention, emphasizing the combined roles of viral immune evasion and BBB-mediated anatomical exclusion. We then review recent proof-of-concept studies showing that antibody-based rescue after central nervous system invasion is biologically plausible, particularly when antibodies are delivered directly into the central nervous system (CNS), retain Fc-dependent immune activity, or are modified to improve BBB penetration. Building on these findings, we discuss key design principles for next-generation therapeutics, including epitope breadth, resistance to viral escape, Fc tuning, and delivery modules based on peptide shuttles or receptor-mediated transcytosis platforms such as TfR1- and CD98hc-targeted systems. Finally, we highlight the major translational barriers that still separate experimental rescue from clinical therapy, including the narrow therapeutic window, model limitations, safety concerns, ethical issues, implementation constraints, and the need for standardized endpoints.

Indexed as

antibody engineeringblood-brain barrierbrain-targeted deliveryimmunotherapyrabiesshuttle antibody

Identifiers

PMID42514926
PMCPMC13416311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.