Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42514838›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Morphology-Guided Screening of PLA/Cellulose Biocomposites for Melt-Spun Monofilaments: Micronized Eucalyptus Kraft Pulp Versus Microcrystalline Cellulose.

Mário Pinto, Susana Gomes, Manuel Vieira, Juliana Silva, Alexandre Gaspar, Bruno F A Valente, Tomás Duarte, Paulo F Teixeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mário PintoCeNTI-Centre for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, R. Fernando Mesquita 2785, 4760-034 Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal.
Susana GomesCeNTI-Centre for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, R. Fernando Mesquita 2785, 4760-034 Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0005-8737-9555
Manuel VieiraCeNTI-Centre for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, R. Fernando Mesquita 2785, 4760-034 Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal.
Juliana SilvaCeNTI-Centre for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, R. Fernando Mesquita 2785, 4760-034 Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9102-4651
Alexandre GasparRAIZ-Forest and Paper Research Institute, Quinta de S. Francisco, Rua José Estevão (EN 230-1), 3800-783 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0009-7936-714X
Bruno F A ValenteRAIZ-Forest and Paper Research Institute, Quinta de S. Francisco, Rua José Estevão (EN 230-1), 3800-783 Aveiro, Portugal.
Tomás DuarteRAIZ-Forest and Paper Research Institute, Quinta de S. Francisco, Rua José Estevão (EN 230-1), 3800-783 Aveiro, Portugal.
Paulo F TeixeiraCeNTI-Centre for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, R. Fernando Mesquita 2785, 4760-034 Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6641-6859

Funding

Recovery and Resilience Plan (PRR) and by the Next Generation EU European Funds, through the Green Agenda for Business Innovation "From Fossil to Forest - Sustainable packaging and products to replace fossil plastic" Project no.8 with the application C644920945-00000036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is a promising bio-based polymer for melt-spun fibres, but its low melt strength, brittleness and narrow processing window limit broader use. This study evaluates PLA/cellulose biocomposites for monofilament melt spinning by comparing micronized bleached Eucalyptus kraft pulp-derived fibres (P200) with microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as a particulate reference, within a fixed compatibilizer/processing-aid formulation. Composites containing different cellulose contents were prepared by melt compounding and assessed by thermal analysis, oscillatory rheology, mechanical testing and fracture morphology; selected 5 wt.% formulations were then processed into monofilaments. Cellulose incorporation increased the onset degradation temperature of the PLA reference, while the rheological and mechanical responses depended strongly on reinforcement morphology. P200 promoted stronger low-frequency melt structuring, stiffness and crystallization tendency, but also a greater reduction in ductility, with notched impact strength decreasing significantly only at the highest P200 loading. MCC produced a more moderate composite-level response. Stable continuous monofilaments were obtained from both selected cellulose-containing formulations, although neither matched the drawable window or draw-induced mechanical development of the PLA reference formulation. Among the cellulose-containing systems, the 5 wt.% MCC formulation retained the more favourable balance between reinforcement and melt-spinning processability.

Indexed as

biocompositesbleached eucalyptus kraft pulpcellulose morphologymelt compoundingmelt spinningmicrocrystalline cellulosepoly(lactic acid)

Identifiers

PMID42514838
PMCPMC13416875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.