ArticlePolymers2026
Morphology-Guided Screening of PLA/Cellulose Biocomposites for Melt-Spun Monofilaments: Micronized Eucalyptus Kraft Pulp Versus Microcrystalline Cellulose.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is a promising bio-based polymer for melt-spun fibres, but its low melt strength, brittleness and narrow processing window limit broader use. This study evaluates PLA/cellulose biocomposites for monofilament melt spinning by comparing micronized bleached Eucalyptus kraft pulp-derived fibres (P200) with microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as a particulate reference, within a fixed compatibilizer/processing-aid formulation. Composites containing different cellulose contents were prepared by melt compounding and assessed by thermal analysis, oscillatory rheology, mechanical testing and fracture morphology; selected 5 wt.% formulations were then processed into monofilaments. Cellulose incorporation increased the onset degradation temperature of the PLA reference, while the rheological and mechanical responses depended strongly on reinforcement morphology. P200 promoted stronger low-frequency melt structuring, stiffness and crystallization tendency, but also a greater reduction in ductility, with notched impact strength decreasing significantly only at the highest P200 loading. MCC produced a more moderate composite-level response. Stable continuous monofilaments were obtained from both selected cellulose-containing formulations, although neither matched the drawable window or draw-induced mechanical development of the PLA reference formulation. Among the cellulose-containing systems, the 5 wt.% MCC formulation retained the more favourable balance between reinforcement and melt-spinning processability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.