Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42514809›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis to Reduce the Carbon Footprint of Polypropylene Processing Using Primary Industrial Data.

Chiara Antonacci, Elena Battiston, Diego Zamboni, Silvia Gross, Anna Mazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chiara AntonacciDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padua, 35132 Padua, Italy.
Elena BattistonDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padua, 35132 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-1729-2587
Diego ZamboniDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Silvia GrossDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Anna MazziDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padua, 35132 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7870-5535

Funding

European Union GRINS PE00000018 - CUP C93C22005270001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of polypropylene (PP) processing commonly rely on generic secondary databases, while primary industrial inventories for plastic conversion processes remain scarce. This study addresses this gap by quantifying the cradle-to-gate carbon footprint of polypropylene processing using anonymised primary industrial data collected in 2024 from four European polypropylene processing facilities. Unlike previous studies relying mainly on generic secondary inventories, the proposed approach combines primary industrial data with sensitivity and scenario analyses to identify practical priorities for emission reduction. The baseline carbon footprint was estimated at 1.44 tCO

Indexed as

carbon footprintlife cycle assessmentplastic processingpolypropylene

Identifiers

PMID42514809
PMCPMC13417197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.