ArticlePolymers2026
Material Properties of Human Bone-Derived Gelatin.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A comprehensive evaluation of allogeneic human bone-derived gelatin (hBG) was conducted as a promising material for regenerative medicine and 3D bioprinting. Comparative analysis with a commercial animal-derived gelatin product (hereinafter CDH) revealed a similar FTIR spectral profile, confirming the retention of key functional groups. Rheological analysis under steady shear showed that hBG is a pseudoplastic fluid with a concentration-dependent viscosity. However, a complete characterization of bioinks requires oscillatory measurements (G', G″, and gelation point), which are planned in future studies. In vitro experiments on spheroid models (chondroblasts) demonstrated biocompatibility, an absence of cytotoxicity, and support for cell viability in 5% and 10% (hBG-5/10) matrices. Owing to its origin, the material allows for the modeling of "human-in-human" conditions, which makes it a promising precursor for the development of bioinks and matrices in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. However, definitive positioning of the material as a bioink requires additional oscillatory rheological studies (determination of G', G″, thixotropy, and gelation point), which were not performed in the present work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.