ArticlePolymers2026
Impact Absorption Optimization in Rigid Polyurethane Foams Modified with Diethanolamine.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rigid polyurethane foams are used in impact-attenuation systems due to their tunable cellular structure and energy dissipation capacity. However, expanded polystyrene (EPS), commonly used for impact protection, presents limitations related to impact attenuation performance and limited design flexibility. This study evaluates the impact performance of rigid polyurethane foams modified with diethanolamine and assesses formulation efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Rigid PU foam formulations containing 0-3 wt% DEOA were synthesized and characterized by impact testing, apparent density measurements, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, and Thermogravimetric Analysis/Derivative Thermogravimetry. DEA was applied to correlate diethanolamine content with impact absorption efficiency. Excessive crosslinking and reduced energy dissipation were observed above 2 wt%, while concentrations below 0.5 wt% resulted in poorly structured foams. The formulation containing 1 wt% DEOA was identified as the most efficient among the investigated formulations, exhibiting the best overall performance, reducing transmitted peak acceleration by 13.8% compared with neat PU foam, while exhibiting an approximately 48% increase in apparent density, more complete consumption of NCO groups, a more uniform cellular structure, and only modest changes in thermal degradation behavior. These findings indicate that the improved impact performance is associated with the combined effects of increased apparent density, modified cellular morphology, and changes in the polyurethane network promoted by DEOA, underscore the promise of diethanolamine-modified rigid polyurethane (PU) foams for protective applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.