Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42514747›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

The Role of Nozzle Temperature, Bed Temperature, and Post-Treatment Annealing Temperatures in Optimizing Tensile and Flexural Strength of FDM-Printed PEEK.

Sundarakannan Rajendran, Sakthivel Sankaran, Yo-Lun Yang, Kinga Korniejenko, Thirumalai Kumaran Sundaresan, Uthayakumar Marimuthu, Koppiahraj Karuppiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sundarakannan RajendranDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi, Chennai 600062, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8580-411X
Sakthivel SankaranDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Krishnankovil 626126, Tamil Nadu, India.
Yo-Lun YangGraduate Institute of Manufacturing Technology, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5876-1644
Kinga KorniejenkoFaculty of Materials Engineering and Physics, Cracow University of Technology, 37 Jana Pawła II Str., 31864 Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8265-3982
Thirumalai Kumaran SundaresanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, PSG Institute of Technology and Applied Research, Coimbatore 641062, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8737-6796
Uthayakumar MarimuthuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, Kollam 690525, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9789-3049
Koppiahraj KaruppiahDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KIT-Kalaignarkarunanidhi Institute of Technology, Coimbatore 641402, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0513-1478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fused deposition modelling (FDM) is increasingly used to produce high-performance polymer components; however, the mechanical performance of printed parts is often limited by weak interlayer adhesion, void formation, and residual thermal stresses. In this study, the effects of nozzle temperature, bed temperature, and post-treatment annealing temperature on the tensile and flexural strength of FDM-printed polyether ether ketone (PEEK) were investigated and optimized using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). A face-centred central composite design was employed to evaluate the individual, quadratic, and interaction effects of the three thermal parameters. The results showed that post-treatment annealing temperature was the most influential factor, contributing 56.48% to tensile strength and 52.73% to flexural strength, followed by nozzle temperature, which contributed 30.56% and 30.15%, respectively. Bed temperature showed a comparatively smaller individual effect; however, its interaction with nozzle temperature significantly influenced both tensile and flexural strength. The confirmation experiment performed at 200 °C post-treatment temperature, 414 °C nozzle temperature, and 142 °C bed temperature produced a tensile strength of 55.65 MPa and a flexural strength of 81.08 MPa, with prediction errors of 5.63% and 4.08%, respectively. SEM fracture analysis provided qualitative evidence that improved thermal processing reduced interlayer separation and visible void-related defects while promoting a more cohesive fracture morphology. These improvements are attributed to enhanced interlayer fusion, possible polymer-chain diffusion across layer boundaries, and thermal-stress relaxation during annealing. The findings demonstrate that thermal-parameter optimization and post-treatment annealing can improve the mechanical performance of FDM-printed PEEK within the investigated processing window.

Indexed as

fused deposition modellingmechanical propertiesPEEKresponse surface methodology

Identifiers

PMID42514747
PMCPMC13416378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.