ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
Student Perceptions of Preparation and Competency Development During Extramural Clinical Rotations in Germany: An Online Survey.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extramural clinical rotations (ECR) are an integral part of veterinary education in Germany and give students the opportunity to practice and deepen their knowledge and skills. In this study, students from all five veterinary schools in Germany who completed their practical year between the years of 2022 and 2025 were surveyed online regarding their perceived preparedness, their evaluation of teaching during ECR, and what aspects were relevant to them when choosing ECR. Data records of 386 students were analyzed. Being assigned a direct supervisor and feedback meetings were among the five most important aspects for students when choosing their ECR, underlining the importance of a clear structure and constructive feedback for successful learning. More than half of the students reported feeling insufficiently prepared, both theoretically and practically, for surgery. Although the students already passed their propaedeutics exams years before, only 46% of respondents stated having felt (very) well prepared in terms of propaedeutics knowledge going into their ECR, 59% felt (very) well prepared in terms of performing general examinations (routine clinical examinations) and 20% in terms of specific examinations (e.g., neurological or rectal examinations). Meanwhile, 75% of students rated the quality of practical teaching during their ECR positively. However, in some areas-such as specific examinations and diagnostic imaging-there was still room for improvement. Overall, the results suggest that ECR are generally perceived positively. Concerning the feeling of mostly insufficient preparation, further studies are needed to elaborate whether teaching should focus more on practical skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.