ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
Identification of Clinically Relevant Yeasts from Avian Isolates Using API ID32C, MALDI-TOF MS, and ITS Sequencing: Potential Relevance from a One Health Perspective.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wild and synanthropic birds harbour a diverse range of yeasts, including species of recognised clinical relevance. Given their close interaction with human activities, these birds represent a valuable source for investigating environmental yeasts and assessing the performance of identification methods. We investigated yeasts recovered from cloacal and crop samples of birds from Gran Canaria and compared routine identification methods with molecular sequencing. Twenty-four isolates were examined by biochemical profiling (API ID32C) and MALDI-TOF MS. Molecular identification based on ITS sequencing was carried out only for the sixteen isolates for which the two routine methods yielded discordant results, allowing resolution of their taxonomic identification. Phenotypic and proteomic methods showed limited agreement at the species level (8/24; 33.3%), with 16 discordant identifications resolved by sequencing. Pigeon isolates were dominated by members of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.