Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42514622›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2026

The Effect of the Husbandry System and Cortisol Status on the Response of Water Buffalo Calves to Vaccination with the

Nadia Piscopo, Esterina De Carlo, Anna Cerrone, Domenico Vecchio, Michele Napoletano, Agata Campione, Chiara Denise Ambra, Michael J D'Occhio, Marco Esposito, Alessio Cotticelli and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nadia PiscopoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4731-7510
Esterina De CarloExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute of the South, National Reference Centre on Water Buffalo Farming and Productions Hygiene and Technologies, 80100 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7883-1283
Anna CerroneExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute of the South, National Reference Centre on Water Buffalo Farming and Productions Hygiene and Technologies, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Domenico VecchioExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute of the South, National Reference Centre on Water Buffalo Farming and Productions Hygiene and Technologies, 80100 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8766-7224
Michele NapoletanoExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute of the South, National Reference Centre on Water Buffalo Farming and Productions Hygiene and Technologies, 80100 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-8853-3617
Agata CampioneExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute of the South, National Reference Centre on Water Buffalo Farming and Productions Hygiene and Technologies, 80100 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-9256-0306
Chiara Denise AmbraExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute of the South, National Reference Centre on Water Buffalo Farming and Productions Hygiene and Technologies, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Michael J D'OcchioSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8952-3091
Marco EspositoCampania Region-Prevention and Veterinary Public Health Unit, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Alessio CotticelliHuman Sciences Department, Link Campus University, 00165 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5279-9577
Tanja PericDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5154-4222
Giuseppe CampanileDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3242-7274

Funding

Regione Campania n. 445 del 13 maggio 2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucellosis negatively impacts animal and human health and causes major economic losses. The present study examined the relationship of husbandry system (insufficient, acceptable, optimal) and cortisol status on the response of buffalo calves to vaccination with the brucellosis vaccine RB51. Primary vaccination (1st) was at 6 months and secondary vaccination (2nd) at 12 months. Cortisol was ascertained in samples of hair and the antibody response to vaccination was measured in blood. Excretion of the bacterium

Indexed as

antibody responsebuffalo farmscortisolmanagementvaccine RB51

Identifiers

PMID42514622
PMCPMC13417067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.