ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Trade-Offs and Synergies Among Ecosystem Services Influenced by Forest Type and Their Implications for Spatial Management in the Upper Minjiang River Basin, China.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Upper Minjiang River Basin is a critical ecological barrier in the upper Yangtze River, where forest ecosystems play a vital role in carbon sequestration, water conservation, and soil retention. Given that different forest types exhibit significant variations in community structure, species composition, and ecological processes, their ecosystem service (ES) supplies and trade-off/synergy relationships are also expected to show distinct heterogeneity. However, systematic research on the trade-offs and synergies of ESs across different forest types remains limited, constraining the development of precision forest management and differentiated management strategies. To deal with this, we used the InVEST model and calculated five key services across the basin: carbon stock (CS), water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), habitat quality (HQ), and forest stock volume (FSV). We then applied Spearman's correlation, root mean square deviation (RMSD), and the GeoDetector model to analyze trade-offs and uncover driving mechanisms. Finally, we used spatially constrained K-means clustering to map different management zones. The results indicate that the Upper Minjiang River Basin stored 1.78 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.