Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42514361›Full record

ReviewNutrients2026

Daily Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation as a Foundational Pillar in Osteoporosis Management: A Narrative Review.

María Pascual-Pastor, Mireia Barceló-Bru

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

María Pascual-PastorRheumatology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7976-2654
Mireia Barceló-BruRheumatology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6531-4698

Funding

ITF Research Pharma Private
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a progressive skeletal disorder characterized by decreased bone strength and an increased risk of fractures. It presents a high global prevalence, thus imposing a significant clinical and economic burden. This narrative review includes current evidence on the role of combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the management and prevention of osteoporosis, as well as its effect on reducing fracture risk and maintaining bone mineral density. It aims to provide an overview of osteoporosis pathophysiology, the importance of adequate calcium levels and 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and the prevalence of their deficiencies. The review examines the evidence supporting combined supplementation and its importance in patients receiving anti-osteoporotic pharmacological therapies. Current clinical guidelines and consensus statements, along with their recommendations for dosing, formulation, and monitoring of calcium and vitamin D supplements, are included. Barriers to the effective implementation, gaps in clinical practice, patient adherence, and primary care challenges are discussed. Ultimately, this review examines the cost-effectiveness of supplementation and the areas for improvement in real-world evidence and research in the field of osteoporosis. This work aims to provide clinicians and healthcare professionals with an updated, evidence-based framework for optimizing calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the care of patients with osteoporosis.

Indexed as

CalciumCalcium, DietaryDietary SupplementsOsteoporosisVitamin DBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsHumansVitamin D Deficiency25-hydroxyvitamin DBone Density Conservation AgentsCalciumCalcium, DietaryVitamin Dantiresorptive treatmentcalcium supplementationfracturesosteoporosisvitamin D supplementation

Identifiers

PMID42514361
PMCPMC13415038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.