ReviewNutrients2026
Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Vitamin D Deficiency and Its Association with Mental Health Outcomes Among Females.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study is to analyze trends in global research on vitamin D deficiency and mental health outcomes among women using bibliometric methods, focusing on publication output, citation patterns, collaboration structures, thematic research clusters, and key gaps in the existing literature.
methodsA structured bibliometric search of the Scopus database identified 1124 English-language, peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2024 on vitamin D deficiency and mental health in women. Data were analyzed using VOSviewer-Version 1.6.20 to visualize publication trends, citation impact, co-authorship networks, and thematic clusters. Basic statistics were used to explain the publication patterns, while the analysis of networks revealed new research themes and connections across different areas of study.
resultsResearch output increased steadily, reaching a peak in 2024. Annweiler, C. was the most prolific author. Leading institutions included the University of Western Ontario, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and Monash University based on citation impact. The United States contributed the most publications, followed by the United Kingdom and China. Thematic analysis showed strong links between vitamin D deficiency and depression, anxiety, neurodegenerative disorders, and metabolic conditions.
conclusionsThis bibliometric analysis highlights the growing academic interest in vitamin D deficiency and its association with mental health outcomes among women. The findings reflect patterns in research activity, collaboration, and thematic focus rather than evidence of clinical effectiveness or causal relationships. While significant progress has been made, gaps remain in gender-specific research, life stage analysis, and representation from low- and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.