ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Beyond Screen Time: A Measurement Framework for Behavioral Exposures in Childhood Myopia.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retinal Vascular Caliber and Its Ocular and Systemic Correlates in Children Living at High Altitude.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cellular Biological Basis and Novel Breakthroughs in the Pathogenesis of Myopia - A Narrative Review.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Childhood myopia is increasingly discussed in relation to digital device use, yet total screen duration is biologically nonspecific (not tied to a single biological cause) and may combine outdoor-light deficit, near work intensity, educational routines, and sleep/circadian timing. This critical narrative review used structured database searches to support transparent source identification, not systematic completeness, quantitative pooling, or formal risk-of-bias grading. We narratively appraised evidence by design, exposure specificity, outcome specificity, temporality, and clinical directness, then derived a measurement framework. Outdoor light exposure has the strongest support for preventing incident myopia. Near work and the visual demands of schooling are important, but they are measured in inconsistent ways. Sleep and circadian timing remain biologically plausible, albeit lower-certainty modifiers. Digital device metrics are best interpreted as contextual measurement markers that can recover timing, bout structure, task context, substitution, and adherence, rather than as standalone causal surrogates (stand-ins for a true cause). The proposed framework prioritizes direct measurement of outdoor light, near work intensity, sleep/circadian timing, and axial-growth outcomes, using device-related behavior only when it clarifies daily exposure patterns. This is a narrative review of previously described behavioral factors; it does not identify new risk factors or propose a novel causal model. For measurement, it groups these behaviors by how they occur together across a single day and separates substitution, mediation, interaction, and temporal clustering as distinct estimands (the specific quantities to be estimated). Its purpose is to improve exposure measurement and hypothesis testing, not to establish digital device use, sleep timing, or clustered routines as independent causal risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.