ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Neurosensory Integration and Balance Adaptation: Personalization of Postural Control Through the Prism of Individual Spatial Perception.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Postural control is a multilevel adaptive system that stabilizes the body in space through dynamic sensory rebalancing and predictive neuromotor regulation. This review synthesizes current data on the neural mechanisms of balance maintenance, individual strategies for integrating multisensory information, and the role of immersive virtual reality as a controlled experimental and neuromodulation platform, synthesising evidence from 73 studies across neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and VR-based rehabilitation. Particular attention is paid to the cognitive style of "field dependence/independence", which reflects stable preferences for the dominance of visual or vestibular-proprioceptive signals and consistently predicts the selection of postural strategies. We show that traditional averaged models ignore interpersonal variability, whereas immersive VR allows for the parametric induction of sensory conflicts, quantitative assessment of sensory dependence profiles, and facilitates the study of adaptive reorganization at the cortical, brainstem, and spinal levels. The review substantiates the need to move from standardized protocols to personalized approaches in diagnostics and neurorehabilitation that consider individual patterns of input rebalancing. The integration of behavioural metrics with neurophysiological markers in a VR environment provides a foundation for developing predictive balance models and targeted training interventions. However, the translational application of VR-based approaches requires careful consideration of methodological limitations, including cybersickness, hardware latency, and ecological validity, to ensure robust and generalisable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.