Non-Invasive Assessment of Hypertonic Muscle Properties After Botulinum Toxin Neuromodulation in Post-Stroke Patients: A Systematic Literature Review of Recent Evidence (2023-2025) on Mobility and Balance.

backgroundPost-stroke spasticity is a frequent and disabling consequence of stroke, including when affecting the lower limbs, where it may impair stance, gait, balance, postural control, functional independence and quality of life. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is widely used as a focal neuromodulatory treatment for post-stroke spasticity. However, the relationship between BoNT-A-induced reduction in muscle hypertonia, objective changes in spastic muscle's biomechanical properties, and functional outcomes such as mobility and balance remains insufficiently clarified. This systematic review aimed to synthesize recent evidence regarding the non-invasive assessment of spastic muscle properties following BoNT-A administration in post-stroke patients, with emphasis on mobility and balance outcomes.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was performed in international electronic databases and included studies published between 1 January 2023 and 31 December 2025. The search strategy used specific keywords and keyword combinations/syntaxes, contextually, related to the topic of interest.

resultsA total of 32 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final data analysis and synthesis, comprising 13 primary clinical studies-6 randomized or controlled interventional studies and 7 observational studies-together with 12 reviews or evidence syntheses, 3 technical or clinical framework papers, and 4 survey, epidemiological, health-services or health-economic studies. Overall, the included articles addressed BoNT-A treatment in post-stroke spasticity, with partial focus on muscle properties, gait, mobility, and functional outcomes. However, only a limited number of studies investigated objective non-invasive assessment methods, and few directly related muscle-property changes in balance and mobility outcomes. Formal risk-of-bias assessment and quantitative synthesis were not performed because of the substantial heterogeneity of the included evidence, with only two studies being potentially suitable for pooling and these addressing different muscle groups, interventions, and outcome domains. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThe reviewed literature confirms the clinical relevance of BoNT-A in the management of post-stroke spasticity. However, most studies assess treatment effects mainly through clinical scales, while objective evaluation of muscle stiffness, elasticity, viscoelastic properties, and their relationship with mobility and balance remains limited. Although some studies address gait, functional recovery, or muscle-related changes, the combined use of BoNT-A treatment, myotonometric assessment, and proprioceptive-stabilometric evaluation is largely absent. Therefore, current evidence highlights an important research gap and supports the need for future longitudinal studies integrating non-invasive biomechanical and balance assessment tools to better monitor treatment response and guide individualized neurorehabilitation in post-stroke patients.