ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Explainable Multi-Modal Deep Learning for Recording-Level Classification of Respiratory Audio Signals Under Internal and Domain-Shift Evaluation.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Respiratory diseases are a major global health challenge. However, identification of respiratory diseases is often limited by subjectivity, environmental noise and inter-clinician variability. This study presents an explainable multimodal deep learning framework for recording-level multiclass classification of respiratory audio signals. The proposed system integrates two complementary representations-a spectro-temporal encoder based on a CNN-BiLSTM-attention architecture and a handcrafted acoustic-feature encoder capturing acoustic descriptors commonly used in respiratory-audio analysis, including MFCCs, zero-crossing rate, spectral centroid, spectral bandwidth, chroma, RMS energy, and spectral rolloff features. These branches are combined through late-stage fusion to leverage both data-driven representation learning and domain-informed acoustic cues. The proposed model was trained and internally evaluated on the Asthma Detection Dataset Version 2, comprising five respiratory categories: bronchial disease, asthma, COPD, healthy, and pneumonia. Mono conversion, resampling to 16 kHz, 100-2000 Hz band-pass filtering, amplitude normalisation, fixed 4 s trimming or zero-padding, training-only augmentation, handcrafted-feature extraction, mel-spectrogram generation, quality control auditing, and stratified recording-level partitioning have been applied in the pre-processing steps. Across five repeated experiments with different random seeds, the proposed hybrid model achieved a mean held-out recording-level test accuracy of 0.9099±0.0163, balanced accuracy of 0.8936±0.0152, macro F1-score of 0.8937±0.0177, macro ROC-AUC of 0.9867±0.0010, and macro PR-AUC of 0.9489±0.0044. Conventional machine learning baseline comparisons showed that the proposed model achieved stronger internal accuracy, balanced accuracy, macro recall, macro F1-score, and macro ROC-AUC than classical machine learning algorithms trained on handcrafted acoustic features, although Random Forest remained competitive in macro PR-AUC. Ablation analysis shows that the deep spectro-temporal branch was the primary contributor to predictive performance, while the handcrafted branch provided complementary interpretable acoustic information rather than consistently improving all classification metrics. Explainability was incorporated using Grad-CAM and Integrated Gradients for spectrogram-based interpretation and SHAP for handcrafted-feature attribution. Domain-shift evaluation on the ICBHI Respiratory Sound Database and a COPD-focused cohort revealed substantial dataset shift effects, including poor healthy-case recognition on ICBHI and seed-dependent COPD recognition in the COPD-focused cohort. Identifier-aware sensitivity analyses showed lower performance than the main recording-level split, suggesting that subject-like or source-level overlap may inflate internal performance estimates. The findings should be interpreted as promising internal held-out recording-level algorithmic performance with limited external transfer, rather than evidence of readiness for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.