ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Morphological and Epidemiological Analysis of the Sphenoid Sinus Based on Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narrative Review.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe sphenoid sinus occupies a strategically central position at the base of the skull, in close proximity to critical neurovascular structures including the pituitary gland, optic nerves, internal carotid arteries, and the cavernous sinus. Its complex anatomical configuration and pronounced individual variability render it a structure of paramount clinical importance in transsphenoidal approaches to the sellar and parasellar regions.
methodsA narrative review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the SANRA (Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles) guidelines for narrative reviews. A comprehensive search was performed across four electronic databases-PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar-covering publications from January 2000 through March 2026, with the final search update completed in March 2026. An initial pool of 826 articles was identified. Following title and abstract screening, 421 articles were retained for full-text assessment; of these, 307 contributed to the conceptual synthesis, and 100 are directly cited in the manuscript. The literature selection process followed a structured flow diagram consistent with PRISMA reporting principles for identification and screening stages.
resultsWe synthesise current evidence on the embryological development, macroscopic and microscopic anatomy, morphological classifications, and epidemiological distribution of anatomical variations in the sphenoid sinus, with emphasis on radiological assessment and surgical relevance. The spectrum of pneumatization patterns-from the conchal type through presellar and sellar variants to the postsellar, clival, and lateral types-is reviewed alongside population-level prevalence data. Common and rare variations are examined, including intrasinus septation, Onodi cells, and bony dehiscences overlying the internal carotid artery and optic nerve. The comparative diagnostic capabilities of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are evaluated, alongside emerging modalities such as three-dimensional reconstruction, virtual reality, and augmented reality.
conclusionsDetailed morphological knowledge of the sphenoid sinus plays an important role in surgical strategy, instrument selection, and risk mitigation in skull base surgery. Individualised preoperative imaging-integrating CT, MRI, and, where available, immersive digital technologies-is essential for safe transsphenoidal planning and cannot be replaced by standard anatomical templates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.