Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42514138›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparative Effectiveness of Adjuvant XELOX Versus TS-1 Monotherapy After D2 Gastrectomy for Stage III Gastric Cancer: A Real-World Nationwide Cohort Study.

Meng-Hsing Ho, Chih-Wei Yang, Po-Huang Chen, Jia-Hong Chen, Ping-Hsuan Hsieh, Heng-Jun Lin, Li-Yuan Bai, Cheng-Hsiang Lo, Yu-Guang Chen, Ching-Liang Ho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meng-Hsing HoDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei 114202, Taiwan.
Chih-Wei YangDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei 114202, Taiwan.
Po-Huang ChenDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei 114202, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0280-6417
Jia-Hong ChenDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei 114202, Taiwan.
Ping-Hsuan HsiehCollege of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical University, Taipei 114202, Taiwan.
Heng-Jun LinManagement Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404327, Taiwan.
Li-Yuan BaiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404327, Taiwan.
Cheng-Hsiang LoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei 114202, Taiwan.
Yu-Guang ChenDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei 114202, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4379-5416
Ching-Liang HoDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei 114202, Taiwan.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council 114-2314-B-016-004-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adjuvant XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) and TS-1 (S-1) monotherapy are both guideline-recommended following D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer, yet head-to-head real-world data exclusively in stage III disease remain scarce. Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database linked to the Taiwan Cancer Registry-Long Form, we identified stage III gastric cancer patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy (2010-2019) and received adjuvant XELOX or TS-1 for ≥3 months. Propensity score matching balanced chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy cohorts (1706/group). Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint; disease progression was defined as initiation of FOLFOX salvage chemotherapy (used as a pragmatic proxy for disease recurrence). A second propensity score matching was performed directly between XELOX (n = 533) and TS-1 (n = 893) groups, yielding 490 matched pairs with well-balanced baseline characteristics. Multivariable Cox regression was adjusted for sex, age, comorbidities, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. TS-1 was associated with significantly better OS (adjusted HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.86;

Indexed as

adjuvant chemotherapyCAPOXD2 gastrectomygastric canceroverall survivalpropensity score matchingreal-world evidenceS-1TS-1XELOX

Identifiers

PMID42514138
PMCPMC13412420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.