ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Exploring the Role of Superplasticizers in Tailoring the Aqueous Dispersions of Graphene Nanoplatelets.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graphene nanoplatelets (GnPs) exhibit exceptional properties for advanced functional applications; nevertheless, their effective utilization is critically limited by agglomeration and poor dispersion. The incorporation of polycarboxylate-based superplasticizers (SPs) enables improved dispersion yet simultaneously introduces insulating effects that hinder conductive network formation. In the present article, we systematically investigate the interplay between GnPs and an SP under varying ultrasonic energy inputs to optimize dispersion and electrical performance through low-cost suspension processing. Dielectric measurements identify the key parameters governing conductive network formation and reveal the dual role of the SP as both dispersant and electrical barrier. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, combined with optical microscopy, provides further insights into the state of dispersion and charge-transport behaviour of the suspensions. For the first time, a wide range of SP and GnP concentrations were systematically analysed in terms of electrical properties. The proposed methodology provides a robust and facile approach for on-site characterization of aqueous suspensions with varying GnPs and SP concentrations. Furthermore, an equivalent circuit model is developed to quantitatively validate the experimental results, offering deeper insights into the underlying conduction mechanisms. GnP concentrations of 0.15, 0.50 and 1.00 wt.% were investigated at varying ratios of SP to GnP (0, 1, 2, 4, and 8). Dispersions without SP addition require ultrasonication up to 80 kJ for the GnP agglomerates to break. SP addition at a quantity equal to GnPs (SP1) reduces the amount of appropriate ultrasonic energy for creating a conductive network up to 65 kJ and even more (SP2) at 45 kJ. The fourfold (SP4) and eightfold (SP8) ratio of SP to GnP require higher ultrasonic energy, up to 82 kJ and 70 kJ, accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.