Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42513861›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Analysis of Some Empirical Equations for Modeling Sound Absorption of Porous Absorbers.

Valentín Gómez Escobar, Celia Moreno González

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Valentín Gómez EscobarDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Escuela Politécnica, Institute for Sustainable Regional Development (INTERRA), Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. de la Universidad s/n, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6969-1450
Celia Moreno GonzálezDepartamento de Física Aplicada, Escuela Politécnica, Institute for Sustainable Regional Development (INTERRA), Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. de la Universidad s/n, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3023-4150

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The empirical Delany-Bazley model and several of its subsequent modifications were evaluated to determine their ability to predict the sound absorption coefficient spectra of porous materials. The study considered three porous materials (foam, mineral wool and samples made from recycled cigarette butt) with different thicknesses. Model performance was assessed by comparing theoretical predictions with impedance tube measurements using the root mean square error (RMSE). Although some models yielded lower prediction errors for specific materials and thicknesses, the results showed that sample thickness-and the associated changes in the shape of the sound absorption spectrum-have a greater influence on model performance than the material itself. No single empirical model consistently provided the best agreement over the entire thickness range. These findings suggest that the applicability of Delany-Bazley-type empirical models appears to be more closely related to the shape of the sound absorption spectrum than to the material for which they were originally developed. These findings provide practical guidance for selecting suitable models for both conventional and recycled porous sound absorbers.

Indexed as

impedance tubeporous materialssound absorption coefficienttheoretical equationsthickness influence

Identifiers

PMID42513861
PMCPMC13414227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.