ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models for Optimal Prediction of Printed-Line Features in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Material extrusion (MEX), commonly known as fused deposition modeling (FDM), has become a widely adopted additive manufacturing (AM) technology owing to its low equipment cost and broad polymer compatibility. However, the geometric fidelity of the printed line often suffers from defects that compromise overall part quality. Specifically, residual edge non-uniformity degrades surface finish, while uncontrolled line width variability causes undesired gaps or overlaps that undermine mechanical performance. Therefore, ensuring an accurate line width and low edge non-uniformity is essential for advancing material extrusion toward high-precision industrial applications. In this study, a machine learning framework is proposed for the rapid prediction and analysis of printed line characteristics. Nozzle temperature, print speed, and material flow rate were considered as input process parameters. Mean line width and edge non-uniformity were taken as the target responses. Four representative machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, BPNN, GPR, and SVR) were adopted for model development. To enhance predictive accuracy, these models were optimized using Particle Swarm Optimization for automatic hyperparameter tuning. Subsequently, comparative evaluations identified GPR as the optimal predictive model. Furthermore, a SHAP-based interpretability analysis was conducted, revealing that nozzle temperature dominates line width, while the flow rate governs edge non-uniformity. Consequently, this interpretable and computationally efficient surrogate modeling approach provides a robust foundation for future closed-loop quality control and inverse process design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.