Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42513797›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

On the Measurements and Discrepancies Between Declared and Actual Thermal Performance of Reflective Insulation.

Tomasz Kisilewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tomasz KisilewiczFaculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska Str. 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1668-6444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infrared reflective materials are increasingly used in building applications; however, their actual reflective performance is not always consistent with manufacturers' claims. Reliable and accessible methods for evaluating their thermal and reflective properties are therefore needed. This study aimed to develop and validate a practical laboratory procedure for assessing the reflective properties of building materials. The proposed method combines comparative reflectance testing with measurements of thermal resistance. The procedure employs commonly available laboratory equipment, including a high-resolution thermal imaging camera and a plate apparatus used for thermal conductivity evaluation. Five commercially available materials with an aluminum reflective layer were tested using this method. The laboratory measurements showed good agreement with ISO standard-based calculations, confirming the reliability of the method. Among the five tested materials, only two exhibited the declared reflective properties. Scanning electron reflectometry analysis revealed that poor-performing materials either lacked aluminum particles in the surface layer or contained aluminum coatings that were too thin. The proposed procedure provides a simple and effective method for evaluating reflective insulation materials. The results demonstrate that not all products marketed as reflective insulation possess the required reflective characteristics, and that aluminum layer thickness and surface composition are critical factors affecting thermal performance.

Indexed as

emissivityinfrared radiationreflective insulationthermal resistance

Identifiers

PMID42513797
PMCPMC13413377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.