Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42513767›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Metallic Orthopedic Implant Development: A Narrative Review.

Prajwal Guruprasad, Pranav Sivaram, Andrew Cibik, Pierce T Bombard, Albert T Anastasio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prajwal GuruprasadCollege of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH 44272, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-4978-227X
Pranav SivaramCollege of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH 44272, USA.
Andrew CibikWake Forest University School of Medicine, Medicine Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Pierce T BombardWake Forest University School of Medicine, Medicine Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Albert T AnastasioDivision of Foot and Ankle, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medicine Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetallic orthopedic implants face persistent clinical challenges that have proved resistant to incremental conventional development. Machine learning and artificial intelligence offer a complementary paradigm for navigating the high-dimensional design spaces governing implant performance, yet the literature remains fragmented across disciplinary silos with no comprehensive synthesis spanning the full development pipeline.

methodsA structured database search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane (executed May 2026), supplemented by hand-searching of reference lists, identified 33 primary studies organized across five sequential domains: alloy composition discovery, additive manufacturing process-property optimization, lattice and porous structure design, surface engineering and coatings, and corrosion and wear prediction.

resultsAcross all five domains, machine learning approaches, including random forests, convolutional neural networks, Bayesian optimization, generative adversarial networks, physics-informed neural networks, and autonomous multi-agent platforms, have accelerated property prediction and design space exploration beyond experimental or simulation-based methods. Shared barriers to translation include small, heterogeneous datasets, reliance on internal rather than external validation, limited interpretability, and the absence of regulatory frameworks for AI-assisted device design. Representative performance included modulus predictions within ~4 GPa of first-principles values, ML-designed alloys reaching ~42.7 GPa (versus 103-120 GPa for Ti-6Al-4V), property prediction R

conclusionsAddressing these limitations will require open standardized databases linking materials parameters to registry-level clinical outcomes, prospective clinical validation studies, and coordinated engagement between researchers, industry, and regulatory agencies.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingartificial intelligencecorrosionlattice structuresmachine learningorthopedic implantsosseointegrationsurface engineeringtitanium alloyswear

Identifiers

PMID42513767
PMCPMC13413550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.