ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Beyond the Four Pillars: A Risk-Targeted Framework for Vericiguat-A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) remains a major global health burden despite substantial therapeutic advances. Vericiguat, an oral soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator, represents a distinct pharmacological strategy targeting impaired nitric oxide-sGC-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (NO-sGC-cGMP) signaling, a pathway closely linked to endothelial dysfunction, vascular stiffness, myocardial fibrosis, and adverse remodeling. This narrative review synthesizes the current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and clinical positioning of vericiguat across the heart failure spectrum, with a particular focus on worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), while integrating recent trial data, updated guideline recommendations, and emerging real-world evidence to define its contemporary role in clinical practice. Randomized trials, subgroup analyses, and contemporary meta-analyses indicate that vericiguat provides a modest but clinically relevant reduction in HF-related outcomes, especially in high-risk patients with recent decompensation. However, its overall effect appears smaller than that of foundational therapies such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Recently published data from the VICTOR program further refine the role of vericiguat in compensated outpatients with chronic HFrEF, showing a neutral primary outcome but providing supportive hypothesis-generating signals across a broader risk continuum while confirming a favorable safety profile. Overall, vericiguat should be regarded not as a replacement for cornerstone therapy but as a mechanistically complementary, risk-targeted adjunct for selected patients with persistent residual risk despite guideline-directed medical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.