ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
The Diagnostic Value of D-Dimer Testing in the Differential Diagnosis of Acute Abdomen in the Emergency Department.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute abdominal pain is one of the most common presentations in the emergency department, and encompasses a broad spectrum of conditions, ranging from self-limiting inflammatory diseases to life-threatening vascular emergencies. Although D-dimer is well established in the diagnostic work-up of venous thromboembolism and acute aortic syndromes, its role in the evaluation of acute abdomen remains incompletely defined. This narrative review summarizes and critically appraises the current evidence regarding the diagnostic utility of D-dimer across the major causes of acute abdomen. Available data indicate that D-dimer has its greatest clinical value in vascular and ischemic conditions, particularly acute mesenteric ischemia, where its high sensitivity may support rule-out strategies in carefully selected low-risk patients. In contrast, although D-dimer concentrations are frequently elevated in appendicitis, pancreatitis, bowel obstruction, diverticulitis, and gynecological emergencies, its limited specificity precludes its use as a primary diagnostic test in these disorders. Based on the available evidence, we propose a practical emergency department diagnostic framework emphasizing selective rather than routine D-dimer testing. D-dimer should be regarded as an adjunct to clinical evaluation and appropriate imaging, not a stand-alone diagnostic test, with its greatest contribution being the early recognition or exclusion of time-critical vascular abdominal emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.