ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Rehabilitation in Kienböck Disease: A Narrative Review of Current Concepts.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kienböck disease, osteonecrosis of the lunate of uncertain aetiology, presents with progressive pain, stiffness, and grip loss in dominant-hand-using adults during their most productive working years, yet its rehabilitation literature has lagged behind its surgical counterpart. This narrative review synthesises current rehabilitation evidence across conservative and post-operative pathways, mapping recommendations to disease stage and to surgical procedure. Following SANRA-aligned methods with selected PRISMA 2020 transparency elements, we appraise immobilisation and orthotic management, dart-throwing-motion-plane mobilisation, sensorimotor retraining, oedema and pain control, psychosocial screening, and procedure-specific protocols that span joint-levelling osteotomy, vascularised bone grafting (including medial femoral trochlea flap), limited intercarpal arthrodeses, proximal row carpectomy, wrist denervation, and salvage arthrodesis or arthroplasty. Patient-reported, performance-based, and occupational outcome instruments are reviewed, with explicit declaration that no Kienböck-validated MCIDs exist. We also set out an integrative reference frame that cross-walks osseous, articular, and tissue-healing axes, offered as clinical orientation rather than as a validated algorithm. The most pressing evidence gaps (Kienböck-specific functional movement screens, sustained return-to-work data, and procedure-specific rehabilitation cohorts) are translated into four registered, powered, COMET-aligned trial proposals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.