ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Artificial Intelligence and Digital Pathology for Preoperative Lymphovascular Invasion and Metastatic Risk Prediction in Breast Cancer: Bridging the Biopsy-Resection Gap.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is a leading global diagnosis where lymphovascular invasion (LVI) serves as a critical indicator of metastatic potential. Conventional assessment is often hindered by its reliance on postoperative findings, sampling errors, and subjective interobserver variability. This review evaluates how artificial intelligence (AI), digital pathology, and MRI radiomics provide earlier, quantitative estimations of LVI-related risk. The strongest direct evidence currently comes from MRI-based studies, where validation performance often reaches area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.84-0.90. By contrast, digital pathology is especially mature for LVI-adjacent tasks such as lymph node metastasis detection and slide-based relapse-risk modelling, which together provide an important translational foundation for future LVI-specific tools. This review also addresses issues that remain underdeveloped in the literature, including the distinction between lymphatic and vascular invasion, AI-specific risk-of-bias and reporting frameworks, the emerging regulatory landscape for adjacent breast AI tools, and the gap between resection-based development datasets and biopsy-level preoperative use. Although most modern computational models are developed using extensive surgical resection specimens, their true clinical utility hinges on successful validation and performance within the highly restricted, fragmented tissue context of preoperative core needle biopsies. Overall, the field appears most promising when LVI prediction is framed not as an isolated binary task, but as one component of a broader metastatic-risk workflow that supports calibrated, multidisciplinary breast cancer decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.