ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Oral Health Implications of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Other Incretin-Based Therapies.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incretin-based therapies have transformed the management of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Established agents-the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) semaglutide and liraglutide, and the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide-are now widely used, while a diverse pipeline of multi-receptor agents is advancing through late-phase development. GLP-1 receptors are expressed in several oral and other craniofacial tissues, raising the question of how these drugs affect oral health. This narrative review (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov; January 2010-June 2026) integrates mechanistic studies, randomised controlled trials, pharmacovigilance data, society guidance, and the patient-facing phenomena increasingly raised in the dental chair. Preclinical and limited clinical evidence suggests that GLP-1 RAs may attenuate periodontal inflammation, while their effects on alveolar bone remain uncertain, reflecting both direct receptor and indirect metabolic influences. Concurrently, gastrointestinal adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, belching), reduced fluid intake, and possible salivary changes underlie a cluster of patient-reported complaints colloquially termed "Ozempic mouth", "Ozempic teeth", and "Ozempic breath", alongside the facial soft-tissue changes seen in "Ozempic face". Human oral-health-endpoint data remain scarce; much evidence is preclinical, indirect, or derived from case-level or pharmacovigilance reports. The oral cavity is nonetheless a plausible direct target of incretin pharmacotherapy and a practical monitoring site for tolerability. Dental practitioners should proactively manage the oral consequences of these agents, and validated oral health endpoints should be incorporated into future incretin trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.