ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Influenza Vaccination as Cardiovascular Prevention in Adults with Heart Disease.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Herpes Zoster Vaccination as Cardiovascular Prevention in Adults with Heart Disease.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Seasonal influenza is not only a respiratory infection but also a clinically relevant trigger of acute cardiovascular events. In adults with established cardiovascular disease, particularly older adults and patients with recent acute coronary syndrome or heart failure, influenza vaccination should be considered a low-risk, evidence-supported component of cardiovascular prevention rather than solely protection against respiratory disease. The evidence addresses three related but distinct questions: influenza infection as a cardiovascular trigger; influenza vaccination versus placebo or no vaccination; and enhanced or high-dose vaccination versus standard-dose vaccination. Randomized trials and meta-analyses support reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality in higher-risk secondary-prevention populations, with particularly persuasive evidence after myocardial infarction. Recent pragmatic active-comparator trials of high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine, including DANFLU-2 and GALFLU, and the individual-level pooled FLUNITY-HD analysis provide incremental evidence in adults aged 65 years or older, strongest for hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia, cardiorespiratory hospitalization, and heart failure hospitalization. The current priority is implementation: screening, offering, documenting, and communicating vaccination across hospitalization, outpatient cardiology, cardiac rehabilitation, heart failure pathways, primary care, pharmacies, and long-term care. Influenza vaccination should complement, not replace, established guideline-directed cardiovascular therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.