ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Artificial Intelligence for Perioperative Risk Prediction and Prevention in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review and Proposed Conceptual Framework.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac surgery remains a high-risk, resource-intensive domain in which perioperative complications significantly influence clinical outcomes, institutional performance, and healthcare expenditure. Despite advances in technique and protocol standardization, contemporary perioperative management largely relies on static risk stratification and reactive quality assessment. This narrative review synthesizes the current evidence on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning for perioperative risk prediction in cardiac surgery, spanning acute kidney injury, mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, postoperative atrial fibrillation, and intensive care unit deterioration, and critically appraises the methodological limitations, validation gaps, and fairness concerns that constrain clinical translation. Across these applications, predictive models have demonstrated incremental discrimination over conventional risk scores, yet remain predominantly endpoint-specific, single-institution, and disconnected from prospective clinical implementation. Building on this evidence, we propose Preventive Cardiovascular Intelligence (PCInt) as one possible organizing framework that integrates predictive analytics, dynamic risk trajectory modeling, and structured quality improvement methodologies, and we outline how such a framework might be operationalized across the surgical lifecycle. PCInt is presented as a conceptual proposal requiring prospective validation rather than as a validated system. We conclude by discussing implementation barriers, regulatory and ethical considerations, and priorities for future research toward anticipatory, value-based perioperative cardiovascular care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.