Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42513129›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Bioleaching Strategies for Recovering Critical Metals from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries at High Pulp Density.

Qi Chen, Yanling Gu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qi ChenCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China.
Yanling GuCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, owing to the extensive application of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in large-scale energy storage, transportation systems, and portable electronics, the LIB market has expanded rapidly. Proper recycling of spent LIBs can significantly alleviate environmental and economic burdens. Bioleaching, as an environmentally friendly and cost-effective approach for metal recovery from primary and secondary resources, is particularly suitable for the processing of spent LIBs. However, its efficiency significantly decreases under high-pulp-density conditions. Therefore, improving metal recovery performance under such conditions remains a critical challenge. This review systematically summarizes the microorganisms and leaching strategies employed for LIB bioleaching in the related peer-reviewed publications from 2015 to 2025, which were retrieved from the Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases. Based on this, this review analyzes the mechanistic limitations under high-pulp-density conditions and elucidates the key factors responsible for reduced efficiency. Furthermore, several process-intensification strategies are discussed, along with future perspectives for industrial-scale application. The increasing market demand and rapid technological development in LIB recycling highlight the strong potential of bioleaching technologies. This review provides mechanistic insights into microbial recovery processes and offers guidance for future research on high-pulp-density bioleaching systems.

Indexed as

bioleachingcathode materiallithium-ion batteriesmetalsrecovery

Identifiers

PMID42513129
PMCPMC13416413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.