ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Advances in Mechanism of Action and Efficacy of CBP/p300 Inhibitors in Different Subtypes of Breast Cancer.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous malignancy with multiple molecular subtypes and variable treatment responses. Despite advances in endocrine therapy, HER2-targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, treatment resistance and disease recurrence remain major clinical challenges. There is growing evidence that transcriptional plasticity and enhancer relinking contribute to tumor progression and treatment adaptation, highlighting the powerful role of epigenetic regulators. CREB-binding protein (CBP) and E1A-associated protein p300 (EP300) are transcriptional coactivators that regulate breast cancer enhancer activity and lineage-specific gene expression. Emerging research suggests that CBP/p300 is more of a context-dependent vulnerability point than a universal carcinogenic driver. ER-positive tumors exhibit a strong dependence on CBP/p300-mediated transcriptional programs, while the triple-negative breast cancer subgroup, including androgen receptor-positive and immunosuppressive tumors, may rely on CBP/p300-dependent signaling to maintain survival and treatment resistance. This is in contrast to their role in HER2-positive breast cancer. This review summarizes the biological functions of CBP/p300 in breast cancer and discusses subtype-specific vulnerability, biomarker-directed patient stratification, drug resistance mechanisms, rational combination strategies, and current translational challenges, emphasizing the need for precise treatment of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.