ArticleMicromachines2026
HMQ-ES-Stack-GBR: A Hybrid Ensemble Learning Model for Mechanical and Physical Quality Prediction in FDM 3D Printing.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In Fusion Deposition Modeling-based manufacturing, process parameters affect the mechanical and physical properties of the print. Considering these properties, accurately predicting print quality is essential. This is where machine learning (ML) models for three-dimensional (3D) print quality prediction come to the forefront. In this study, a dataset was prepared under strict operational measurement standards-utilizing the Interquartile Range (IQR) method for data sanitization-encompassing 10 material types, 2 printer types, and 4 printing parameters. Five hundred different sample combinations were prepared and printed in sets of three according to ISO 527-2 Type 4 standard dimensions. Tensile, hardness, and surface roughness tests were applied to the prepared samples. Using this validated dataset, a Hybrid Multi-Material Quality-Ensemble System-Stacking-Gradient Boosting Regressor (HMQ-ES-Stack-GBR) architecture is proposed as a diagnostic framework for multi-output quality prediction. Particularly in terms of quality outputs such as tensile strength, hardness, and surface roughness, while also providing a quantitative analysis of the effect of material type on print quality. Furthermore, a multi-objective optimization pipeline integrating three distinct meta-heuristic algorithms-Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO)-was coupled with the framework to systematically derive material-specific optimal processing parameter configurations. Furthermore, the study shows that open-system printers exhibit higher prediction errors than closed-system printers. Reflecting system-induced variability rather than full hardware independence. Although the study is limited to internal validation within the current experimental design and includes material imbalance across filament groups, the findings suggest that the proposed framework provides a promising diagnostic decision-support tool for pre-print quality estimation within the studied dataset. By accurately reflecting rather than physically overcoming manufacturing variability, it supports decision-making processes through pre-print quality estimation, thereby enabling proactive interventions that reduce raw material, time, and energy losses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.