ReviewMicromachines2026
A Review of Non-Laser and Laser Machining for Through-Glass via Fabrication.
Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As semiconductor packaging technology evolves from two-dimensional to three-dimensional integration, the through-glass via (TGV) technique, as a core interconnect method in advanced packaging, is emerging as a strong candidate to replace through-silicon vias (TSVs) and plated through-holes (PTHs) in organic substrates. Glass substrates offer excellent electrical insulation, low dielectric loss, tunable thermal expansion coefficients, and the potential for large-scale panel-level manufacturing. However, issues related to TGV hole quality, metallization uniformity, and thermomechanical reliability remain key bottlenecks limiting their large-scale industrialization. This investigation provides a comparative review of non-laser and laser machining for TGVs to address the above problems. First, the technical background and core advantages of TGVs are outlined. Second, this study details non-laser processing methods, including sandblasting erosion, mechanical drilling, the photosensitive glass method, electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM), deep reactive ion etching (DRIE), and others. Third, laser processing methods, covering laser ablation drilling, laser-induced deep etching (LIDE), femtosecond laser-assisted wet etching and others, are given focus. Moreover, this study analyzes typical applications of TGVs in 3D/2.5D packaging, MEMS devices, optoelectronic integration, and others. In addition, the machining processes of non-laser and laser-based TGVs, such as mechanical machining, ECDM, and LIDE, are compared, and key process challenges, technical trade-offs, and reliability failure mechanisms are discussed. Finally, this review looks ahead to future trends, aiming to provide a systematic technical reference for researchers in the TGV field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.