ArticleMicromachines2026
Experimental Study of Capillary-Rise Behavior and Meniscus Evolution in Glass Capillaries Under an Electric Field.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To elucidate the scale-dependent response and interfacial evolution of liquid capillary rise in glass capillaries under an electric field, capillaries with different inner diameters were used as model channels. The equilibrium capillary-rise behavior of NaCl solutions without an electric field was investigated, and the coupled effects of capillary diameter, temperature, and concentration were analyzed using response surface methodology. The additional rise of the liquid column under a direct-current electric field was examined, and the interfacial evolution mechanism was explored through meniscus visualization. The results show that, without an electric field, the equilibrium capillary height is governed mainly by capillary inner diameter, followed by temperature, whereas concentration has a relatively weak effect. The developed quadratic regression model shows high fitting accuracy. Under the applied electric field, the electrocapillary response exhibits clear scale selectivity. No significant additional rise was observed in the 0.1 mm and 0.3 mm capillaries, whereas the liquid-column height increased markedly in the 0.5 mm capillary. At 30 °C and 0.75 kV, the additional rise reached 8.2 mm, corresponding to a relative increase of 15.30%. The enhancement at 0.75 kV was stronger than that at 1.5 kV, indicating a non-monotonic voltage response. Meniscus experiments further show that 0.32% NaCl and 5% ethanol solutions respond more evidently to the electric field, with stronger interfacial restructuring for NaCl solution at 0.75 kV. These results indicate that the electric field modifies capillary pressure by altering the force balance near the three-phase contact region and the meniscus curvature, thereby inducing additional liquid-column rise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.