ArticleMicromachines2026
Effects of Buoyancy and Surface Roughness on Mechanical Characterization of Shipbuilding Steel by Immersion Instrumented Indentation.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop the applications of nanoindentation in a liquid environment, a higher requirement has been presented for evaluating measured errors of micromechanical performance, particularly for the immersion indentation. In this study, a numerical investigation was conducted to explore the influence of buoyancy and surface roughness on the indentation responses of EH36 steel. The results show that a difference in indentation load-depth curves and mechanical properties with and without the buoyancy effect is observed as the indentation depth increases. The relative calculated errors of reduced modulus and indentation hardness are more than 25.35% and 1.92%, respectively. Meanwhile, as the surface roughness increases, a pronounced increase in the data scatter of indentation responses is observed, especially at shallow nanoindentations. The coupling effects of buoyancy and surface roughness on the deviation of indentation data exhibit a competitive relationship rather than a simple cumulative effect. The measured errors of reduced modulus at roughness values below 0.10 μm are predominantly affected by buoyancy during immersion indentations, while the surface roughness is the main factor in other cases. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of these factors and predicts the qualitative variations in micromechanical responses under assumed immersed conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.