ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026
Multimodal Deep Learning Approaches for Lung Disease Detection: A Review.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung diseases are among the leading global causes of morbidity and mortality, and existing reviews on deep learning (DL) for pulmonary diagnosis rarely integrate imaging, acoustic, and electronic health record (EHR) modalities within a single framework. We aimed to synthesize the state of the art (2019-2024) in multimodal DL for lung disease detection and classification, identifying dominant architectures, performance benchmarks, and translational barriers across chest X-rays, CT scans, respiratory sounds, and EHRs. A structured narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science, applying explicit inclusion criteria for peer-reviewed studies; performance metrics, dataset characteristics, and reported limitations were extracted. Research involving convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and more recent models such as Transformers have reported high performance in chest X-ray classification, whereas acoustic approaches based on spectrograms and self-supervised representations (e.g., Wav2Vec 2.0) show promising but dataset-dependent results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.