ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The EU Midwifery Directive and Professional Strengthening in New EU Member States and Candidate Countries.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article examines the impact of the EU Directive on the recognition of professional qualifications (2005/36/EC) on the development and strengthening of midwifery in countries that joined the European Union in recent decades, with a particular focus on Central and Eastern Europe. Focusing on experiences from Croatia, Poland, Slovenia, Bulgaria, and the Czech Republic, the paper explores how alignment with the Directive influenced education reform, professional recognition, and scope of practice. Drawing on the experiences presented, we argue that the Directive has functioned as more than a technical requirement for EU accession. By establishing minimum educational standards, it supported the transition from vocational to university-level education, facilitated pathways for the existing workforce to align with new qualification requirements, and contributed to the recognition of midwifery as a distinct regulated profession. It also provided a clear framework for defining midwives' competencies and scope of practice within health systems, acting both as a protective mechanism, by safeguarding professional standards, autonomy, and professional identity, and as an enabling framework by supporting workforce development, educational reform, and the integration of midwives into health systems during periods of institutional transition. The lessons drawn from these national experiences can inform the ongoing update of the Directive, led by the EU Commission, by illustrating how legislative alignment can strengthen midwifery education and professional recognition, while also supporting countries undergoing or preparing for EU accession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.