ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Type A and Type D Personality in Cardiovascular Health: A Narrative Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review critically summarizes the literature on the associations of Type A and Type D personality, together with related personality traits, with cardiovascular disease (CVD) onset, prognosis, cardiac surgery, and rehabilitation outcomes. For the past half a century, there has been a consistent interest in the question of whether or not there is a connection between personality qualities and CVD. At the same time as individuals with a Type A personality who were angry, competitive, and excessively motivated were overrepresented among patients seeking treatment for CVD, it was also noted that these individuals were more likely to acquire coronary artery disease or syndrome. Anger and animosity were among the unfavorable impacts that were found to be connected with worse cardiovascular outcomes, according to the findings of research. After that, a new personality entity was brought into existence, which was referred to as the type D "distressed" personality. This personality type coupled negative affectivity and social inhibition. Type D personality subsequently became a major focus of research, and several studies reported associations with poorer patient-reported health and adverse cardiac outcomes. However, these findings have not been consistently replicated, and the stability, incremental predictive value, and independence of Type D personality from depression, disease severity, and other psychosocial factors remain debated. As a result, there are a number of criticisms that pertain to the current knowledge of the connection between personality construct and the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases as well as the outcome of these diseases. This review provides a critical narrative synthesis of supportive and conflicting evidence and highlights the methodological limitations that currently prevent definitive causal or prognostic conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.