ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence in Social Health: A Narrative Review of Uses, Advantages, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is deeply integrated into daily life. Emerging evidence suggests AI may help change the dynamics of social relationships by influencing social interactions, connectivity, and interpersonal relationships, and by providing new avenues for communication and contributing to improved social well-being. Therefore, this review aims to explore the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies as a tool to enhance social health, focusing on current applications, advantages, challenges, and ethical considerations associated with their implementation, as well as opportunities for future development. The literature on the relationship between the connectedness of social health dimensions and AI as a tool to better understand how interactions with AI technologies may influence social well-being. In this current review, key terms such as "Artificial Intelligence", "Social Health", "social inequalities", "AI algorithm", "AI technology", "social connection", "digital communication", "social participation", "social support", "social isolation", "loneliness", "mental wellbeing", were used to search relevant literature on Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Sciences. In addition, relevant aspects of the multidimensional impacts of AI on social health dimensions are also discussed. The use of AI technologies by individuals within societies was found to hold profound potential to reshape social health through enhancing social relationships, bridging communication gaps in diverse populations, stimulating social dynamics, and understanding human emotions. It may contribute to reducing social inequalities, promoting equity, accommodating individual differences, and enhancing the effectiveness of many tasks in the social and health care systems through deep learning, natural language processing, and machine learning techniques. This reduces social exclusion and increases accessibility and quality of health and social services. However, AI has also posed distinguishable challenges to its adoption, specifically in terms of data quality, privacy and security, algorithmic bias, ethical issues, public trust and acceptance, and regulatory and policy gaps. Evidence suggests that building public trust in the future of AI in social health requires interdisciplinary collaboration among health providers and professionals, social scientists, community members, and policymakers. Such collaboration is crucial to ensure that AI platforms do not perpetuate social inequalities or biases by maintaining transparency, explainability, and demonstrated effectiveness. In conclusion, the integration of AI into social health dimensions holds promise for social health transformation. As we move forward, several key areas need to be addressed to develop a robust governance and regulatory framework, along with ethical guidelines to ensure privacy protection, respect for human rights, transparency, and the promotion of the common good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.