ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Skills-Based Human Capital Management in Latvian University Hospitals: A Qualitative Multi-Institutional Study.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesHealth systems increasingly require workforce governance approaches that move beyond formal qualifications and make physician skills more visible for planning, education, quality management, and resource allocation. However, evidence remains limited on how physician skill information is organisationally documented and used within hospitals, particularly in small health systems. This study examined how information on physician skills is organisationally documented, interpreted, and used for workforce governance across all Latvian university hospitals, and identified organisational, cultural, and digital barriers to systematic skills monitoring. MATERIALS AND
methodsA qualitative, exploratory, multi-institutional design was adopted. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 stakeholders from human resources, education, quality, and finance across all three Latvian university hospitals. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, with reporting guided by COREQ and SRQR.
resultsEight interrelated themes were identified across three domains. Current practices were fragmented and primarily focused on formal qualifications rather than verifiable practical skills. Internally delivered education was partially documented, whereas externally acquired skills remained largely outside organisational systems. Skill gaps were usually identified reactively through incidents, complaints, or managerial observation. Training needs were determined through decentralised channels, and skill assessment depended heavily on local leadership judgement. Participants also highlighted financial blind spots, weak digital infrastructure, governance ambiguity, cultural resistance, and limited staffing capacity as barriers to implementation. At the same time, respondents consistently reported that improved skill visibility could support strategic workforce planning, targeted education, patient safety, better financial justification, and greater organisational transparency.
conclusionsLatvian university hospitals appear to recognise the organisational value of physician skill visibility but currently lack integrated systems for capturing and using such information systematically. The findings support the need for a context-sensitive, phased approach to skills-based workforce governance and inform a data-informed conceptual framework (Three-Layer Skills Governance Model) for aligning regulatory expectations, organisational processes, and individual skill records in small health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.