ArticleBrain sciences2026
Microsurgical Untethering of Pediatric Lipomyelomeningocele: A Stepwise, Photo-Illustrated Technical Note.
Article in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lipomyelomeningocele (LMMC) is one of the most common forms of occult spinal dysraphism, with an estimated incidence of 3-6 per 100,000 live births, and microsurgical untethering remains the cornerstone of management for symptomatic and selected at-risk children. The operation is technically demanding: reported rates of long-term symptomatic re-tethering after partial resection still reach 15-25%, and the surgeon must balance adequate untethering against preservation of the placode and lumbosacral nerve roots. In this technical note, we present a stepwise, illustrated description of our institutional 14-step microsurgical technique for pediatric LMMC. Each step is anchored to a defined anatomical landmark, beginning with a midline skin incision planned away from the anal verge and proceeding through subtotal subcutaneous lipoma resection, identification of the dural penetration site, a limited rostral laminectomy over normal anatomy, dural opening with circumferential dissection of lipoma-dura-cord adhesions, exploitation of the arachnoid-dura plane, electrophysiologically guided debulking of the intradural lipoma, stimulation-controlled division of the fatty filum, pia-to-pia reconstruction of the placode with 8-0 monofilament suture, expansile duraplasty with an artificial dural substitute, and reinforced multilayered watertight closure. Technical pearls aimed at minimizing the risks of cord injury, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and postoperative re-tethering are highlighted at each stage, and the role of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is emphasized. This note is intended as a practical, image-anchored operative reference for pediatric neurosurgeons and trainees managing this challenging closed neural tube defect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.