ReviewBrain sciences2026
Biochemical Pathways of Neuroplasticity in Sport Skill Acquisition: From Neuroscience to Coaching Practice.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimMotor skill acquisition is the foundation of athletic performance, from the novice learning a new technique to the elite athlete executing complex movements automatically under pressure. Although classical models have defined the neural substrates of motor control-the cerebellum for error correction, the basal ganglia for action selection, and the primary motor cortex (M1) for execution-emerging evidence suggests that motor learning is the result of the dynamic interaction of multiple parallel processes rather than a linear hierarchy. This narrative review integrates classical neuroanatomical knowledge with contemporary findings on multisite plasticity, with a particular focus on sport-specific adaptations.
methodsWe examined three core learning mechanisms operating in parallel: error-based learning (cerebellar-dependent, driven by sensory prediction errors), reinforcement learning (striatal-dependent, driven by reward prediction errors and dopamine), and use-dependent learning (cortical-dependent, driven by mere repetition). We also summarize the biochemical pathways supporting these learning processes, including glutamatergic LTP-like cortical plasticity, cerebellar mGluR1-PKC-LTD signaling, dopaminergic corticostriatal plasticity, BDNF-TrkB-dependent neurotrophic mechanisms, growth-factor signaling, and exercise-induced muscle-brain communication.
resultsWe then propose a spatiotemporal model in which the relative contribution of each network shifts dynamically across the three stages of skill acquisition, from the early cognitive/strategic phase to the late automatic phase characteristic of elite performance. At the molecular level, these stage-dependent adaptations are supported by synaptic strengthening and weakening mechanisms, reward-dependent dopamine signaling, neurotrophic and growth-factor-mediated remodeling, and peripheral metabolic/myokine signals that modulate brain plasticity during training and recovery. Special attention is given to contextual and sport-specific adaptations, using the paradigmatic example of elite swimmers who demonstrate enhanced short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) selectively in the aquatic environment, reflecting long-term sport-induced neuroplasticity.
conclusionsUnderstanding these dynamic network mechanisms has direct implications for coaching, training periodization, and the development of targeted neuromodulatory interventions to accelerate skill acquisition and optimize athletic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.