Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42512447›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2026

Sonographic Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Monitoring: Technical Evolution and Current Evidence.

Eric A Grin, Erez Nossek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric A GrinDepartment of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-0369-9704
Erez NossekDepartment of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery remains an essential tool in the management of complex cerebrovascular disease, including chronic-ischemic hypoperfused territory as well as intracranial aneurysms requiring parent vessel sacrifice. Reliable postoperative surveillance of graft patency and hemodynamic function is central to long-term success. Sonographic imaging has evolved over four decades from indirect extracranial Doppler waveform analysis through intraoperative microvascular Doppler, quantitative duplex ultrasonography, and transcranial Doppler assessment of intracranial hemodynamics to the contemporary development of trans-sonolucent cranioplasty ultrasonography (TCUS). TCUS, enabled by the replacement of the autologous bone flap with an acoustically transparent polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cranioplasty, permits direct, real-time visualization of the anastomosis and surrounding intracranial vasculature. This can be performed at the bedside and in the outpatient setting, without radiation or contrast. Current evidence, drawn largely from small series and early multicenter experience, positions TCUS as a reliable and potentially cost-effective complement to digital subtraction angiography for serial bypass surveillance, though prospective validation remains needed. This review traces the full arc of sonographic bypass monitoring and addresses current evidence, technical considerations, established quantitative parameters, and directions for future investigation.

Indexed as

cerebral ischemiacerebral revascularizationcerebrovascular disorderscranioplastyextracranial–intracranial bypassintracranial aneurysmtranscranial Dopplerultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42512447
PMCPMC13406802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.