ReviewBrain sciences2026
Beyond Structural Pathology: Central Sensitization and Chronic Pain with Reference to Lumbar Disc Herniation-A Narrative Review.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pain is increasingly understood as a multidimensional condition in which, in a substantial subgroup of patients, a protective symptom can evolve into a persistent maladaptive disorder of the nervous system, while in others it may remain closely tied to ongoing mechanical or structural factors. Central sensitization (CS) represents a key mechanism underlying this transition, characterized by enhanced neural responsiveness and impaired endogenous pain inhibition, leading to a dissociation between pain and tissue pathology. The aim of this narrative review is to critically discuss current evidence on CS as a mechanism-based explanation for persistent pain, using lumbar disk herniation (LDH) as a clinical model of the radiological-clinical mismatch, and to discuss its direct implications for identifying sensitized phenotypes, multimodal assessment, and rehabilitation strategies. A total of 77 sources published between 2006 and 2026 were synthesized. These reviewed sources demonstrate that identification of the sensitized phenotype requires a multimodal assessment approach combining self-report measures, such as the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), with psychophysical methods including quantitative sensory testing (QST) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Cognitive-emotional factors are also critical, as postoperative kinesiophobia affects approximately 38.3% of LDH patients and is associated with increased pain intensity and reduced self-efficacy. Management strategies reported in these publications focus on mechanism-based interventions, particularly pain neuroscience education (PNE) and graded, time-contingent exercise, which aim to modify pain-related cognitions and restore endogenous inhibitory processes. These approaches may be supported by adjunctive therapies, including dry needling (DN), electro-dry needling (EDN), centrally acting pharmacological agents (e.g., serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs] and gabapentinoids), and psychologically informed treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). While surgical decompression may reduce CS-related symptoms, preoperative sensitization does not necessarily predict poorer outcomes, highlighting the interaction between peripheral and central mechanisms. Adopting a sensitization-informed perspective may encourage a broader integration of contemporary pain models alongside traditional structural views in lumbar disc herniation clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.